Protection of Highly Endangered Mountain Yellow-legged Frog Delayed Again

NEWS RELEASE >The Center for North American Herpetology >Lawrence, Kansas > >28 June 2007 > > >Species Protection Waiting List Still Growing: >Not a Single New Species Has Been Protected >in More Than a Year > >San Francisco, California: In response to a >lawsuit from the Center for Biological Diversity >and Pacific Rivers Council, the U.S. Fish and >Wildlife Service today published a “warranted >but precluded" decision, agreeing with >conservationists that the Mountain Yellow-legged >Frog (Rana muscosa) deserves listing as an >endangered species, but claiming listing is >made impossible by “expeditious progress" on the >listing of other species. This is the >same decision the agency made more than four >years ago, which the Ninth Circuit Court of >Appeals determined it had failed to sufficiently support. > >"This decision is obviously a political and >callous delaying tactic that is a recipe for >extinction of the frog," said Jeff Miller, >spokesperson for the Center for Biological >Diversity. >“Given that the Fish and Wildlife Service has >not protected a single species in over a year, >their claim that protection of the frog is >precluded by other listings falls flat.” > >The last species protected by the Fish and >Wildlife Service were 12 Hawaiian picture-wing >flies listed in a single rule on May 9, 2006. >Overall, the Bush administration has listed >fewer species under the Endangered Species Act >than any other administration since the >law was enacted in 1973, to date only listing 58 >species compared to 512 under the >Clinton administration and 234 under the first >Bush administration. Since 2001, the >number of species designated as “warranted but >precluded” and included on the Fish and >Wildlife Service's list of candidate species has >grown from 252 to 279 species. At least 25 >species have gone extinct on this waiting list >after being recognized as candidates for >protection. > >“The Bush administration has closed the doors on >the nation's endangered species," said >Noah Greenwald, conservation biologist with the >Center for Biological Diversity. “If the >Mountain Yellow-legged Frog and literally >hundreds of other species don't receive the >effective protections of the Endangered Species >Act, we will lose them forever.” > >Noting the frog survives in as little as 10 >percent of its original range in the Sierra >Nevada, >Deanna Spooner of the Pacific Rivers Council >wondered: “How much more endangered >does a species have to become before the Fish >and Wildlife Service will take action? The >intent of the Endangered Species Act is being >subverted through administrative delay, >sentencing the Mountain Yellow-legged Frog and >other species in need of immediate >protection to extinction through inaction.” > >Background > >The Mountain Yellow-legged Frog was historically >the most abundant frog in the Sierra >Nevada, ranging from southern Plumas County to >southern Tulare County at elevations >mostly above 6,000 feet. In 1959, David Wake, a >herpetologist with the U.C. Berkeley >Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, reported so many >of the frogs near Tioga Pass that "[i]t >was difficult to walk without stepping on them." >Surveys 30 years later revealed the frogs >were gone. > >The Service acknowledges that the frog has >disappeared from the vast majority of known >historical locations in the Sierra Nevada and >that many of the largest populations have >completely crashed in recent years; one of the >largest remaining populations containing >more than 2,000 adult frogs in 1996 had been >reduced to only two frogs by 1999. >Particularly disturbing are recent frog surveys >in relatively pristine areas of the Sierra >Nevada, in the John Muir Wilderness and Kings >Canyon National Park, that revealed an >alarming decline of more than 40 percent in the >last five to seven years alone. At this rate >of decline, scientists are predicting the frog >will become completely extinct in the Sierra >within decades. > >The species is thought to be declining primarily >due to predation by nonnative trout, >stocked in many high-elevation Sierra lakes by >the California Department of Fish and >Game, which prey upon tadpoles and juvenile >frogs. Other causes include habitat >degradation due to livestock grazing and the >impacts of drought and environmental >changes caused by global warming. Disease has >ravaged many frog populations recently; >factors such as pesticides, acid precipitation, >and increased ultraviolet radiation as a result >of ozone depletion likely render frogs much more >susceptible to disease. Recent research >has linked pesticides that drift from >agricultural areas in the Central Valley and >other >airborne chemical pollutants to adverse impacts >to native amphibians in the Sierra Nevada; >pollutants can directly kill amphibians, >interrupt breeding and feeding activity and >larval >development, and also act as environmental >stressors, which render amphibians more >susceptible to disease. > >The Center for Biological Diversity and Pacific >Rivers Council submitted a formal petition to >list the Mountain Yellow-legged Frog in February >2000 and subsequently filed suit in May >2001 to compel the service to respond to the >listing petition. In December 2001 the >Service was ordered by the Northern District >Court to make a final listing determination for >the species, resulting in the first “warranted >but precluded” determination in January 2003. >


Posted at 06:52 AM | Permalink

 
Read more – offline – from the current issue; subscribe to FRR.