Hudson Shad

Here is the letter that Stripers Forever sent to both NY Governor David Paterson and Commissioner Pete Grannis of the NYDEC.

 

3/18/2008 

 

Governor David A. Paterson

State Capitol

Albany, NY 12224

 

Dear Governor Paterson:

Stripers Forever, a national recreational fishing advocacy group with more than 1,200 members in New York State, is compelled to write you regarding a pending New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) decision that would set a very imprudent precedent. 

In response to a precipitous decline in the population of American shad native to the Hudson River, the DEC is promulgating a regulation that will make it illegal to harvest even one shad for personal consumption while still allowing gill nets to be set in the Hudson River to catch shad in commercial quantities. 

The truly tragic destruction of this country’s marine resources by commercial fishing practices is well known to many people today, but less considered is that this destruction has already greatly reduced fishing opportunities of all kinds for anglers who are far less culpable than is the commercial fishing industry.  This has happened because our regulatory departments are heavily influenced by political forces financed by the very destruction of the fish that the regulators are charged with conserving.  The current Hudson shad stock collapse is just one such example.

The membership of Stripers Forever is 100 percent in favor of conservation.  It is unfortunately clear that all directed fishing for shad should be stopped in the Hudson River, and we know that recreational anglers will willingly support this measure.  But the very idea that a citizen of this country should not be able to take home even one shad per season so that a handful of part-time commercial fishermen can set gill nets to catch enough to sell is counter to the very foundations of our free society.  Essentially, the DEC is privatizing this resource; a citizen who wants a shad for a meal is forced, by law, to buy that fish from one of a select group that has essentially been given the right to the entire harvest.  If we apply that logic to other fish and game management we would never have ended market gunning, but would instead have made anyone who wanted a duck or deer buy it from a market hunter. 

The appalling lack of social fairness in this proposed regulation is bad enough, but we are just as disturbed with the DEC’s decision to continue to allow gill netting.  A gill net is made of thin fibers joined into a series of diamond shapes or meshes into which a fish – or bird or mammal – inserts its head and then cannot get it back out.  Gill nets have been banned along large areas of America’s coastline, and many of us feel they should be banned everywhere.  Certainly gill nets should be banned forever from delicate nursery areas like the Hudson River where they are known to kill indiscriminately a variety of fish and wildlife. Allowing their continued use - even on a somewhat reduced basis - while asking  the public to refrain from keeping even a single fish, is clear testimony of the destructive influence that commercial fishing wields with the DEC. 

As Governor of New York, we ask that you personally intervene and reverse this decision. We do not ask for a recreational bag limit of shad with the situation so dire, but we strongly believe that the correct and fair action is to first end commercial fishing for shad in general and the use of gill nets in particular.  The end of all gill netting in the Hudson River would be the beginning of a positive conservation legacy for your administration. 

 

Sincerely;  

 pict0.jpg

Brad Burns President Stripers Forever  

 

CC: Commissioner Pete Grannis

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

625 Broadway

Albany, New York 12233-0001

 



Here's what you can do to help correct this travesty:

 

1.      Copy and send the above letter that we have written to the governor – modified as you may wish – by both postal mail and e-mail to the governor email Gov Paterson  and to the head of DEC   email Commissioner Grannis .  (note that both postal mailing addresses are on the letter above).  Residents of all states can do this since shad and stripers caught as bycatch in these gill nets are coastal migrants and what happens in NY waters affects us all.

                               

2.      If you are a NY resident, send a note to your state assembly person or senator – go to this link for your senator and this one for the your assembly person – and tell them that you want them to personally contact the DEC and demand that this unfair regulation be rescinded immediately.

 

3.      Bring this issue to the attention of your fishing friends and to the officers of any clubs that you may belong to.  Ask them to join with SF in an effort to repeal this regulation.

 

4.      Ask your fishing friends to join SF – as you know, it is free – so that they may join us in other upcoming efforts to make striped bass a game fish in NY and elsewhere.

 

Brad Burns, President of Stripers Forever




Posted at 08:59 AM | Permalink

Reader Comments:
Old to new | New to old
Apr 9, 2008 10:05 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

you people are not to smart the decline is from off shore fishing for shad, have you ever shad fished probably not man enough to handle a net

Apr 9, 2008 10:10 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

the over population of striped bass also is part of the decline of shad when a shad lays eggs the are hatched the bass love to eat them thats what happened to all the herring in the river, i myself have cought thousands oof bass in my net to wich many of them had herring in there stomach, let fisherman catch stripers in the net and decline the population of bass so the 300 yaer old shad business can rebound

Apr 9, 2008 10:36 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

Oh, yeah. Super idea. Some of the lobstermen want a reduction, too. The damn stripers hang under the lobster boats and swill the shorts. Now that stripers are partly recovered, let’s wipe them out. Get rid of the predators and all will be right with the prey. I learned that from the 19th century government wolfers.
Best,
Ted

Apr 13, 2008 02:05 pm
 Posted by  Eric

Ted, are these guy's real? If one set out to create truly contemptable beneficiaries of the NY DEC's corrupt bargain, these two would be ideal. I can see why they would want the recreational sector removed from their area. In my state, the guy catching "thousands" of stripers in his gill net would be either guilty of a wanton waste or a poacher on a massive scale. We don't take kindly to either one.

Apr 18, 2008 06:54 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

ever since bass were intoduced to the hudson in the 1960s the shad population has decreased at least 75% i would say there are 4 to 7 bass for every shad, the bass fisherman fishes for free, no permit required limit one per day but many keep much more,shad fishing is a lifestyle that dates back o 1600 on the river and it will probably soon end because of the bass problem, i myself have seen to seals in the river in the marlbro area the were chasing whay few herring are left because of the bass problem

Apr 18, 2008 07:29 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

“The bass problem.” What interesting usage. Bass have now recovered to about half their historical abundance, and this is a “problem” because?
Best,
Ted

Aug 13, 2008 07:58 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

bass, natural predators,hudson never had bass until the 50s, they are killing off many species in the estuary, big problem

Aug 13, 2008 08:14 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Whoever told you that "Hudson never had bass until the 50s" was smokin' something mighty potent.
Best,
Ted

Sep 4, 2008 06:40 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

as i recall coming from a shad fishing family that has fished gill nets for over 130 yrs my father told me if you got 2 bass a week back in the 6os that was alot, you must go buy people who are fishing for a living not just some reports that you read bass just came to this river in witch they are destroying in the last 20 yrs i know for first hand

Add your comment:

Create an instant account, or please log in if you have an account. Anonymous comments are enabled.



Verification Question. (This is so we know you are a human and not a spam robot.)

What is 6 + 7 ? 

 
Read more – offline – from the current issue; subscribe to FRR.